you're reading...

Huelskamp endorsed by KFB, Jilka accuses group of abandoning farmers

Republican Tim Huelskamp was endorsed by the Kansas Farm Bureau today, with a strong statement of support by KFB President Steve Baccus.

“Our members recognize if you want to define high ethical values, common sense and respect for life, you look at Tim Huelskamp,” Baccus said in a conference call with reporters Wednesday morning. Baccus also pointed out that when the country was founded, nearly all the representatives were full-time farmers. Now, they’re are only three.

Huelskamp was, of course, grateful for the endorsement, saying, “I think Washington D.C. is populated by people with little to no understanding of rural issues. I’m honored to have KFB’s support.”

However, his Democratic rival for the 1st District seat, Alan Jilka, wasted no time attacking KFB’s choice.

“With this endorsement, the Farm Bureau has abandoned Kansas farmers,” Jilka said.

Jilka’s criticism centers around the support Club for Growth gave to Huelskamp in the primary, as stated in Jilka’s release:

The Club for Growth, which features more than 20 articles on its website condemning farm subsidies, is Huelskamp’s top campaign donor, with $110,065 in campaign expenditures. According to Federal Election Commission records, the group’s political action committee paid most of the money to an ad agency in Maryland to run attack ads against Huelskamp’s primary opponent Jim Barnett. The group endorsed Huelskamp in September 2009.

Jilka went on to say, “Agriculture is the backbone of the Kansas economy. It’s unfortunate that an anti-farmer special interests group devoted to destroying our way of life can have so much influence over a candidate. Tim Huelskamp should immediately return the money this special interest group has donated to him, reject their endorsement, and renounce their position that farm subsidies are hurting America,”

FEC reports show that Club for Growth did independently expend over $100,000 in television ads against former 1st District candidate Jim Barnett, and endorsed Huelskamp in the primary.

During the call, Huelskamp said he supports the subsidies, but sees ways the current system could be improved.

CORRECTION: A $9,558 figure was incorrectly identified as a direct contribution to the Huelskamp campaign. It was, in fact, an independent expenditure. I apologize for the error, and the statement has been redacted from this post.



3 thoughts on “Huelskamp endorsed by KFB, Jilka accuses group of abandoning farmers

  1. Jilka is upset that KFB endorsed a farmer over a Spanish/Portugese student… furniture businessman… big city mayor? Oh how dare they!
    Jilka even has great grandparents and probably other relatives who farmed in Kansas! Oh wait, almost all of us do? Okay then… well… how dare they!!

    Posted by backroadsnewsroom | August 18, 2010, 12:21 pm
  2. You mean the Club for Growth paid for those commercials attacking Barnett?! Total hypocrisy from the Huelskamp campaign.

    Throughout the entire primary the guy ran hard on Kansas values and his farming background, but he’s taking money from a group that everyone know is trying to kill direct payments.

    He was also endorsed by Ron Paul, another one trying to kill off farm payments.

    You have lost my vote Mr. Huelskamp.


    Posted by wildcatfan88 | August 18, 2010, 3:45 pm
  3. Here’s the link calling them the ‘Club for Greed.’

    I’m calling the Huelskamp campaign and demanding an explanation.


    Posted by wildcatfan88 | August 18, 2010, 4:47 pm

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: