//
you're reading...
Uncategorized

Candidates Fall Short Of Honor Roll

The Citizens For Higher Education group released its 2009/10 report card for state Representatives and Senators showing how state law makers voted in issues critical to higher education.  Legislators were graded on a range of votes involving tuition, funding and policy issues for Regents universities and community colleges, campus safety, appropriations, budgets and more. While the report details all law makers actions, of note are the grades for the two Senators seeking a seat in Washington.

Huelskamp received a lifetime grade of an F- he’s one of 17 Senators to receive that grade. Fellow 1st District candidate Jim Barnett received a slightly better but still not spectacular grade of a C.

Out of a possible 44 points law makers could have earned for votes on various pieces of legislation, Huelskamp earned only 20. The report indicates he did not vote for the Kan-Ed funding and four other bills that impacted higher education. That being said, one of the bills that the organization took into account was the 2011 budget, which Huelskamp voted against.

Barnett’s record shows he earned 29 points with points also deducted for not voting for the 2011 budget bill.

The Citizens For Higher Education organization promotes the economic impact of higher education in various communities and statewide. A separate report claims Barnett’s district benefits from 3,869 jobs for post secondary education and $218.6 million in overall economic benefit. Huelskamp’s district reportedly saw 1,550 jobs and $79.2 million in overall economic benefit from secondary education.

The entire report can be found at kansashighereducation.org.

Advertisements

About Katie Stockstill-Sawyer

I am a city girl that is learning about life on the farm. I met and married a fourth-generation farmer, Derek. I am now a farmer's wife and country girl. The move has required a few changes and a lot of learning. But I wouldn't change my new life and all of the little lessons and surprises it provides.

Discussion

2 thoughts on “Candidates Fall Short Of Honor Roll

  1. This is a good group to get bad marks from. They are constantly whining about more and more and more and more money for education without ever a care about increasing the quality of the educational experience. Good for Tim for getting what appears to be a perfect score of not wasting the taxpayer’s dollar.

    Posted by altevogt | July 21, 2010, 3:52 pm
  2. I agree with altevogt. I wonder who the A+ candidates might be? Probably those that worked hard to raise taxes and do anything the KNEA wants. F- won’t affect education in Kansas, no matter how much those groups pretend it will.

    Posted by backroadsnewsroom | July 22, 2010, 9:09 am

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: